Request a Demo

2025 Franchise Growth Benchmarks

What 460+ Brands’ Real Data Shows for Franchise Growth

Benchmark your development, conversion, engagement and opening performance against three years of anonymized FranConnect platform activity. The goal is not just to compare numbers. It is to identify where performance differs, where constraints may exist and which parts of the growth system warrant closer investigation.

460+

Franchise brands across multiple industries and growth stages.

3.4M

Tracked leads across three years of development activity.

33K+

Signed agreements observed from inquiry to award.

178K+

Locations in the growth and engagement benchmark base.

2025 Headline

Stronger Growth Was Associated With Conversion, Engagement and Opening Execution

Lead volume rose modestly while conversion efficiency improved and opening execution remained an important part of realized growth.

Conversion Efficiency Improved Sharply

Lead volume moved from 991K in 2023 to 1.062M in 2025, while lead-to-agreement conversion climbed from 0.76% to 1.50%.

Higher Engagement Was Associated With Higher Net Unit Growth

High-engagement brands showed 1.9x the net unit growth of low-engagement brands in the 2025 benchmark. The relationship is associative and does not establish that engagement alone caused the difference.

SBNO Became a Strategic Constraint

8,379 sold-but-not-opened units entered 2026, leaving substantial committed growth dependent on opening execution.

~97%

Lead-to-agreement conversion increased from 0.76% in 2023 to 1.50% in 2025.

Three-Year View

Conversion Improved Faster Than Lead Volume

Metric202320242025
Lead volume991K1,027K1,062K
Lead-to-agreement conversion0.76%0.96%1.50%
High vs. low engagement growth multiple1.8x1.2x1.9x
+71K

Only about 71K more leads entered the observed funnel in 2025 than 2023.

+0.74 pts

Conversion increased by 0.74 percentage points over the same period.

1.9x

High-engagement brands showed a larger net unit growth difference versus low-engagement brands in 2025.

Vertical Benchmarks

2025 Conversion by Vertical

VerticalLead-to-Agreement Conversion
QSR2.81%
Retail Food2.37%
Retail Products2.24%
Commercial & Residential Services1.50%
Personal Services1.28%
Automotive0.56%
Business Services0.49%
Full-Service Restaurants0.44%
What this means: QSR conversion is more than six times the Full-Service Restaurant benchmark. Franchise leaders should benchmark within their operating context before treating any blended average as a target.

Lead Source Quality

Lead Sources Converted at Very Different Rates

Lead Source2025 Conversion
Internal Network18.9%
Trade Show13.5%
Brokers3.9%
Internet0.9%
Franchise Website0.6%
31.5x

Internal-network leads converted at roughly 31.5 times the rate of franchise-website leads in the 2025 benchmark.

Response remains a measurable operating factor: no-response losses fell 30% from 2023 to 2025, but the benchmark does not establish one universal response-time threshold or a single cause for the change.

Engagement

Engagement Is a Useful Operating Signal

The benchmark shows an association between observable operating engagement and stronger unit growth.

YearHigh EngagementLow EngagementGrowth Multiple
2023+7.9+4.41.8x
2024+10.7+8.71.2x
2025+12.8+6.91.9x
48%

High-engagement brands opened an average of 38.6 units in 2025 versus 26.0 for low-engagement brands.

Opening Pipeline

8,379 Signed Units Were Still Waiting to Open

The sold-but-not-opened pipeline exposes the gap between selling future units and converting those commitments into operating locations.

SegmentUnits in Pipeline% of Active System
Enterprise (300+ units)5,5643.8%
Mid-Market (75–300 units)1,9487.7%
SMB (under 75 units)86713.3%

Enterprise Carries the Volume

Large systems account for the majority of SBNO units in absolute terms.

SMB Has the Highest SBNO Share Relative to Active Units

For smaller systems, 867 SBNO units equal 13.3% of the active-system base, making SBNO proportionally more significant in this segment.

Opening Execution Affects When Signed Units Begin Operating

Site selection, financing, training, construction, readiness and launch all influence when contracted growth begins operating and generating revenue.

Stronger Performers

Operating Patterns Worth Investigating

Respond Faster

Measure the time between inquiry and meaningful contact and test whether faster response is associated with better progression in your own funnel.

Qualify Better

Prioritize candidate fit, intent and execution discipline, then compare progression and conversion instead of assuming more lead volume automatically produces more awards.

Manage Beyond the Signature

Treat post-signing execution as part of the growth system and measure how structured milestones, handoffs, training and visibility relate to opening performance.

The growth system is connected: development performance, candidate engagement, opening velocity and franchisee operating engagement can be analyzed together to identify relationships, constraints and follow-up questions.

Methodology

How the Benchmark Was Built

The benchmark uses anonymized, opted-in FranConnect platform activity from 2023–2025 across 460+ brands, approximately 3.4 million leads, 33,000+ signed agreements and 178,000+ locations. Brand-size segments are Enterprise (300+ units), Mid-Market (75–300) and SMB (under 75).

Lead-to-award conversion is signed agreements divided by tracked leads; net unit growth is openings minus terminations; engagement compares top- and bottom-quartile brands using operating activity signals; SBNO means a signed unit that has not yet opened.

These benchmarks are informational peer references, not legal, financial or franchise-sales guidance. Results vary by market, brand maturity and execution. Any use in prospective-franchisee materials should be reviewed by qualified franchise counsel for FDD Item 19 considerations.

See Where Your Brand Stands

Identify Where Your Growth System May Need Attention

Compare your conversion rate, lead-source performance, engagement signals and SBNO pipeline against the 2025 benchmark.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FranConnect Franchise Growth Benchmark?

The FranConnect Franchise Growth Benchmark is a cross-brand research benchmark built from anonymized, opted-in FranConnect platform activity across the stated 2023–2025 dataset.

Why does conversion matter more than raw lead volume?

Because the benchmark shows lead volume changed only modestly while conversion improved substantially. Speed, qualification, source mix and sales execution are operating factors worth investigating, but the aggregate benchmark does not establish which factor caused the improvement.

What is SBNO?

Sold But Not Opened: a signed franchise unit that has not yet opened and begun contributing to active system growth.

Why is engagement included in a growth benchmark?

Because engagement can provide operating context after the sale. The benchmark shows materially stronger unit growth among high-engagement brands, but the relationship should be treated as an association rather than proof that engagement caused the growth difference.

Can these benchmarks be used in franchise sales materials?

Only after review by qualified franchise counsel, particularly for FDD Item 19 implications.

About This Benchmark Dataset

This page reports findings from the FranConnect Franchise Growth Benchmark, a first-party cross-brand research dataset. Benchmark findings should be distinguished from individual FranConnect customer outcomes and from Franchise Sales Index reporting.

Source category: Franchise Growth Benchmark. Use these findings as benchmark research for the stated reporting period, not as guaranteed customer outcomes.

Put the research to work

Compare your franchise sales performance

Use FranConnect’s interactive Franchise Sales Index Comparison Tool to turn benchmark research into a directional comparison for your own franchise development funnel. For definitions, source context and limitations, review the FranConnect research methodology.